PUBLISHED APPELLATE DIVISION DECISION FROM AUGUST 18, 2016 REGARDING STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS AND FRAUD CLAIMS

Catena v. Raytheon Company (App. Div. August 18, 2016) Approved for publication.

In this appeal, the Appellate Division applied the discovery rule to fraud claims under common law and the Consumer Fraud Act arising from the sale of commercial real property. The seller and his lender, both defendants, knew about environmental contamination on the property, which they partly remediated before the closing. Rather than disclose that information, the seller provided plaintiff an affidavit stating that he was unaware of any contamination on the site. In reversing the summary judgment dismissal on statute of limitations grounds, the Appellate Division held that discovery did not occur until plaintiff was aware of facts indicating defendant knew his statements were false, and intended plaintiff to rely upon their falsity. The Appellate Division based this on the rule that a plaintiff cannot discover the basis for a fraud claim until he is aware of facts establishing the essential elements of the claim, one of which is mens rea.